Rising BRICS trade deficit figures have catalyzed major concerns across various significant economic sectors in South Africa, and right now, new data reveals a $9.6 billion increase in the country’s trade imbalance with partner nations. Through several key policy evaluations, the growing deficit has spearheaded questions about whether South Africa’s approach to BRICS trade delivers tangible economic benefits, or if the nation’s membership serves primarily political purposes at the time of writing.

Across multiple essential trade frameworks, the rising BRICS trade deficit has accelerated pressure on policymakers, and with no formal trade framework in place, South Africa faces mounting challenges to either push for stronger economic integration or reconsider its position within the grouping it joined back in 2010.

Also Read: BRICS Plan to Move From 50% to 65–70% Global Gold Control in 2026

South Africa BRICS Trade Strategy Amid Rising Economic Imbalances

The Numbers Behind the Crisis

The rising BRICS trade deficit between South Africa and its partners has transformed various major aspects of bilateral economic relationships, and it’s reached a point where economic analysts are questioning the country’s continued participation. Through several key research initiatives, recent reports from Business Day have revealed that the $9.6 billion increase in the deficit highlights a fundamental problem that’s been there for years—BRICS countries trade more with nations outside the group than with each other, which creates an Intra-BRICS trade imbalance. Across numerous significant economic indicators, this pattern has persisted since South Africa joined the bloc.

Research conducted by Professor Bhaso Ndzendze, a professor of politics and international relations at the University of Johannesburg, pioneered new analysis methodologies and was published in the Asian Review of Political Economy. His study stated:

“Looking at the period between 2010, when South Africa first entered Brics, up to 2024 points to three trends. The first is that South Africa has had a deficit, and that this trade position has not changed over the 14-year period.”

Through various major analytical frameworks, the research also noted:

“Third, when compared with the EU and the US, the Brics deficit is out of proportion. Indeed, South Africa enjoys a narrowing deficit with the former and a surplus with the latter.”

Agricultural economist Wandile Sihlobo has noted that the BRICS grouping has indeed provided limited economic benefit to South Africa, with China being the notable exception. Across several key trade categories, the lack of a formal trade arrangement means higher tariffs remain on various products within BRICS, and exports and investment in the region stay disappointingly low at the time of writing.

Missing Economic Framework Fuels Risks

BRICS remains a loose, informal grouping with no sound economic or trade approach holding the countries together, and this absence of structure catalyzes multiple strategic concerns that critics argue should address the bloc’s challenges rather than dismissing it entirely. Through certain critical institutional gaps, and without a proper BRICS trade agreement, member nations naturally gravitate toward established trading relationships elsewhere, which continues contributing to the rising BRICS trade deficit over the years. Involving numerous significant bilateral partnerships, South Africa conducts its predominant economic relationships and investments with the Western world, and this reality reflects a broader problem with BRICS economic ambition.

Across several key economic development areas, the constraining factor isn’t just geography or historical ties—it’s the lack of institutional mechanisms to facilitate genuine economic cooperation among member states. Wandile Sihlobo’s analysis leveraged various major policy considerations and argued that the path forward isn’t abandoning BRICS but rather elevating its ambitions. He stated:

“Due to the lack of a formal trade arrangement, the BRICS countries tend to trade more with countries outside the group. We see higher tariffs remaining on various products within the BRICS.”

He also emphasized:

“As South Africa, our approach to trade should be to balance and retain our existing trading partners in Europe, the Americas, and other parts of the world, while simultaneously pushing for an ambitious trade agreement within BRICS and exploring ways to attract investment.”

Tariff Asymmetries Worsen the Imbalance

Research has engineered new understanding revealing that South Africa maintains the lowest tariff rates toward BRICS partners at 4.9% to 5.3%, while Russia’s general tariff—the next lowest—sits at 10.3%. Through multiple essential trade policy evaluations, this asymmetrical openness has accelerated the rising BRICS trade deficit, as South African markets remain more accessible to BRICS imports than vice versa, and this creates what some call an Intra-BRICS trade imbalance that disadvantages South Africa right now. Across various significant manufacturing sectors, DTIC minister Parks Tau told Business Day it’s important for South Africa to pursue manufactured goods for export rather than primary goods, which make up the bulk of what the country trades with BRICS nations.

Jorge Maia, who is the Head of Research at South Africa’s Industrial Development Corporation, spearheaded certain critical analyses and emphasized:

“This highlights the importance of enhancing export sales to other BRICS countries, for the balance of trade is skewed in their favour, especially where China is concerned.”

Balancing Act Required

South Africa doesn’t have the luxury of choosing sides in trade matters right now, and through several key diplomatic channels, the nation needs friendships across the world. Analysts argue the solution isn’t to abandon BRICS but rather to elevate the grouping’s BRICS economic ambition, and across numerous significant policy considerations, the strategy also needs to account for future growth engines and opportunities. India is likely to drive global growth over the next two decades as its per capita GDP catches up with more developed economies, and through various major bilateral initiatives, deepening trade relationships with such partners could prove essential for South Africa’s long-term economic progress at the time of writing. This represents an opportunity within the BRICS framework that hasn’t been fully exploited yet.

Intra-BRICS trade imbalance

When analysts examine the Intra-BRICS trade imbalance closely, involving multiple essential economic indicators, the grouping generates little activity beyond political matters at the time of writing. China stands as the exception, maintaining substantial trade relationships with multiple BRICS members, and through certain critical bilateral agreements, this pattern reveals an uncomfortable truth that BRICS can’t sustain itself on political alignment alone. Across several key institutional development areas, other BRICS countries also need to buy into the story of elevating the grouping’s BRICS economic ambition for long-term sustainability.

Also Read: BRICS Becomes Lifeline For Farmers As China Opens $23.3 Million Market

The rising BRICS trade deficit serves as a wake-up call for South Africa’s approach to the bloc, and through various major strategic reassessments, the question that remains is whether member nations can transform BRICS from a primarily political alliance into a genuine economic partnership that delivers measurable benefits to all participants. Involving numerous significant policy reforms, policymakers must also determine whether South Africa can navigate the BRICS trade agreement risks while maintaining its relationships with Western partners right now.